Archive for the ‘Monthly Commentary’ Category

29 Feb

Budget 2012 – The Southern Charter Analysis

Posted at 12:41 by Mark Thompson

On the 22nd February the Minister of Finance, Pravin Gordhan, presented a budget that tries, as usual, to balance a range of competing objectives such as fiscal discipline as well as job creation and a reasonable level of social assistance.

The Budget Numbers

For the 2011/12 fiscal year the Minister of Finance expects the budget balance to record a deficit of 4.8% of GDP. This is better than the 5.5% the Minister projected in October 2011. This will please the rating agencies, and should help South Africa avoid an outright ratings downgrade over the coming months.

The surge in the budget deficit over the past few years comes at a high cost.Government debt has risen from a low of 27.2% of GDP in 2008/09 to 36.0% of GDP in 2010/11 and is projected to rise to 41.0% of GDP in 2012/2013. This is the largest debt level, as a ratio of GDP, that South Africa has experienced since 2001/2002.

Expenditure

Key areas of growth in government spending during 2012/2013 remain education, health, housing and community development, public order and safety. The Minister also announced an increased focus on infrastructural activity, with Transnet at the centre of the strategy. Transnet is expected to spend R300bn over the next 7 years.

Revenue

Total government revenue is budgeted to increase by a relatively modest 9.0% in fiscal 2012/2013, which seems realistic given the downward revision to the 2012 growth forecasts. In addition, the composition of tax revenue is not expected to change significantly over the coming year, with the bulk of the revenue still being derived from direct taxes in the form of personal income tax (36% of total) and company tax (21% of total).

Indirect taxes, such as VAT and the fuel levy, have grown steadily over the years and now comprise an indispensable component of tax revenue. In fact, the revenue received from VAT (26.2% of total) consistently and significantly exceeds corporate tax receipts, with 2012/2013 not expected to be an exception.

The Minister announced a number of tax changes in the budget. The largest tax change was an adjustment to the thresholds and tax brackets applicable to individual income tax. This is really to alleviate some of the effects of inflation, or what is referred to as ‘fiscal drag’. The value of this adjustment is R9.5 billion, which is enough to compensate for the effects of inflation or fiscal drag; and above the R8.1 billion tax relief that was granted to individuals in last year’s budget.

The Minister left the top marginal tax rate of 40% unchanged, although the threshold at which this is reached was increased modestly from above R580 000 to above R617 000 (a rise of 6.4%, which is broadly in-line with inflation). The change in threshold/brackets means that someone earning R100 000 a year will get annual tax relief of R685, while someone earning R1 000 000 will get tax relief of R4 795 a year.

The budget included a shock 20c/l increase in the fuel levy as well as an 8c/l increase in the fuel price for the road accident fund. The increase in the fuel levy is expected to raise an additional R4.5 billion in revenue. Unfortunately, South Africa is currently also experiencing a significant daily under recovery on the domestic petrol price of around 34c/l. This means that at the beginning of March the local petrol price could rise by a further, 53c/l, taking the price of 95 Octane in Johannesburg to another record high of R11.48c/l. This will negatively impact inflation as well as consumer activity.

The Minister also announced the customary increase in excise duties, which is projected to provide the government with an additional R1.84 billion in revenue.

Other tax changes included the introduction of the long-expected withholding tax on dividends (levied at 15%, and not the expected 10%), and a rise in the capital gains tax. On the plus side, the individual is encouraged to save more through a proposed adjustment to retirement taxes. To see comments by our tax expert, Michael Smythe, click here.

Overall, although the Minister provided some tax relief to individuals in order to compensate for the effects of fiscal drag, this was mostly offset by the increase in the fuel levy as well as the excise duties. Correspondingly, this was not an especially consumer friendly budget, which ultimately reflects the need for the Minister to contain the budget deficit.

In conclusion

Overall, the budget does a good job in meeting a broad range of competing demands. The Minister has managed to reflect a focus on fiscal discipline, but still provide a stimulus to the economy in the form of increased infrastructural spending. Of course, the government itself is not really embarking on an expanded infrastructural program; rather this is being conducted mainly through Transnet and Eskom. Nevertheless, the upgrading of South Africa’s energy, rail and port infrastructure is vital to our economic success; and long overdue.

The road to restoring fiscal discipline will not be easy. In particular, the government is likely to struggle to contain the overall increase in their wage bill. In addition, the growth in tax revenue will only be achieved if there is a reasonable pick-up in economic growth.

Lastly, while South Africa’s public sector debt parameters remain very acceptable by world standards, the total debt as well as the cost of servicing that debt is clearly on the rise. If left unchecked, government debt will quickly become a major hindrance to achieving many vital policy objectives. Already the cost of debt exceeds the total budget allocation to police services. Hence the Minister’s decision to focus on maintaining fiscal discipline, despite difficult circumstances, has to be applauded.

Fund overview and positioning

Global prospects have started to improve over the last few weeks, as the ECB provided liquidity to the European banking system and the outlook for the US economy improved. On the back of this the prospects for the equity market have improved. Within our funds, we are overweight offshore equities and underweight local equities. Given the current attractive valuations and positive growth story we will look to add to equities opportunistically. Our view remains that we want low cash holdings, given the negative real yield offered and favour inflation-linked bonds as a hedge to rising inflation, which is now more likely given the various budget announcements. We have also recently added to our global property exposure as it offers much more attractive yields than global bonds or cash.

31 Jan

2012 – Another challenging year?

Posted at 16:22 by Mark Thompson

2011 was a year dominated by a number of events which certainly weren’t on the radar at the beginning of the year. The horrific Japanese tsunami, the Eurozone debt crisis, a downgrading of US debt and uprisings in the Middle East, all of which were unpredictable and resulted in huge volatility across the markets. Consequently high returns were generated in unexpected places like global bonds and global property. Offshore assets did well, benefiting from a blow-off in the Rand in late 2011, while local equities returns were disappointing. We managed to navigate our funds through a very uncertain 2011 to deliver returns in excess of both cash and inflation on the back of our defensive asset allocation strategy and high offshore exposure.

Returns in 2011

Returns in 2011

The question is where to now? At this stage there are a number of positive trends both offshore and locally.

• Although world growth is expected to slow to 3.3% from 3.8% according to the IMF, this is not a massive fall and growth still remains above 3%. Encouragingly, better US job data, manufacturing and housing data all point to firm growth in the US of around 1.8%. This combined with positive growth in Asia will help offset the drag from recession-stricken Europe.

• The risk of a global banking crisis was reduced in December when the European Central Bank lent 489 billion Euros at 1% for 3 years to 523 Eurozone banks across the 17 Eurozone countries. This dramatically reduced the risk of a systemic crisis in Europe for the year ahead by ensuring that banks have adequate liquidity.

• Global inflationary pressures are easing with both oil and world food prices lower compared to this time last year. This will allow emerging market policymakers to ease rates while monetary policy in the developed world will remain stimulatory. In fact, over the last 5 months there have been 62 cuts in interest rates around the world, whereas in 2011 there were twice as many interest rates hikes as cuts, all of which will be growth supportive.

• On the local front, growth is expected to reach 2.8% this year, slightly less than last year. This will be largely driven by consumer spending as disposable income has been boosted by 7%-plus wage agreements, record low interest rates and  public sector  employment growth. Manufacturing and mining remain sluggish.

• Inflation which is running at 6.1% is expected to remain above 6% for the rest of the year due to high administered price (electricity, water, fuel etc) increases as well as the recent Rand weakness. The extent to which these price pressures will impact inflation will be influenced by the strength of the domestic economy which is currently slowing, thereby creating less opportunity for companies to pass-on cost increases.

• At this stage the inflation rate is unlikely to pose a significant concern for the monetary authorities. The Reserve Bank seems reasonably comfortable in tolerating an inflation rate slightly above the target, especially in an environment where economic activity is subdued and global inflation is projected to moderate during the course of the year. Hence the Reserve Bank is expected to leave interest rates unchanged well into late 2012.

Although developments on the economic front do seem to be more positive there are a number of risks out there that we are very cognisant of, such as: the ongoing sovereign debt crisis and the potential restructuring of the Eurozone, tension around Iran, slower growth in China, presidential elections in the US, the weak US housing sector, the large US deficit and the potential for a global banking crisis if policymakers blunder.

These are a few of the major risks we can identify for 2012 but as in the words of Donald Rumsfeld “There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don’t know we don’t know.” And the latter could well end up dominating the headlines once again!

Fund overview and positioning

Given the risks mentioned above, we maintain our cautious stance within the funds with an overall neutral weight to equities. Within that we are overweight offshore equities and underweight local equities. Given the current attractive valuations and positive growth story we will look to add to equities opportunistically. Our view remains that we want low cash holdings, given the negative real yield offered and favour inflation-linked bonds as a hedge to rising inflation. We will also look to add to our global property exposure as it offers more attractive yields than global bonds.

To access the latest fund fact sheets, click here.

Ursula Maritz
Chief Investment Officer

30 Nov

Politicians Spoil the Party

Posted at 09:44 by Mark Thompson

Economic Comment – Politicians spoil the party

Recent data from the US, such as a reduction in jobless claims, rising industrial production, good housing starts and consumer confidence suggests that US growth has picked up in the final quarter and could exceed 3% on an annualised basis. This good news was overridden, however, by the failure of the US “supercommittee” to finalise plans to reduce the US federal deficit. Due to this, an automatic default deficit plan kicks in, which acts as an immediate break on spending and ends some of Bush’s tax cuts. The economy has some respite, however, as these savings will only start in January 2013 and will be effective over a 10 year period, which give the politicians some more time.

In Europe, politicians appear unable to come up with a sustainable way to save Europe and concerns have started to build up regarding the solvency of other European countries.  French, Italian and Spanish bond yields all widened significantly above German bond yields. This has added pressure on policy makers to find a solution around German objections to the ECB buying up European sovereign debt. This is in sharp contrast to the Fed, who are committed to low interest rates till 2013 and who have made massive bond purchases aimed at keeping yields low.

Politics are set to dominate headlines well into next year with presidential elections in the US and a change of guard in China, both in November.  This will be the biggest political shift in China in a decade as a new 25 person Politburo, the supreme decision-making body in the country, will be elected. This will give a group of new young leaders the opportunity to exert some influence.

As in the words of Mohammed El Eian, CEO of Pimco, commenting on trends in the market, “this is not a call on companies, it is about the policymaking in Athens, Berlin, Frankfurt, Rome and Washington DC “and he should have added Beijing.

Fund Comment – Added to equities cautiously 

During the course of October, we started to add back to direct equities by selling out of the Allan Gray Stable fund and adding to Foord’s Equity fund. This was based on attractive equity valuations, following the 10% drop in the JSE in July/August. The funds benefitted, as local equities staged a 9.3% rally in the month. Resources stocks, in particular did well, up 11.4%.  Biliton, Sasol and Anglos, which are well represented in our top ten holdings all followed suit.

Our offshore exposure had great month with equities up 7.4% while global property delivered 8.4%.  We have had an exposure to global property since January and with its 22.5% return for the year to date has made an important contribution to our fund’s performance.  Although we have added to equities both locally and offshore, we remain cautious given ongoing sovereign debt issues, the high risk of a recession in the Eurozone, the recent failure by the US “supercommittee” and still weak job growth in the US.

Lastly, at Southern Charter, not only do we aim to add value through tactical asset allocation but we also aim to select managers who are world class in what they do. So it is very exciting for us that one of the funds we have selected, the Catalyst Global Real Estate fund, was ranked 1st by Morningstar* out of 54 global real estate funds for their 3 year performance to October. The fund delivered an annualised return of 21.5% in dollar terms over the period.

*Morningstar is an independent research house.

Click below to download the latest fact sheets:

Growth Fund Fact Sheet CurrentBalanced Fund Fact Sheet CurrentDefensive Fund Fact Sheet Current

 

Ursula Maritz
Chief Investment Officer

22 Sep

A Cautious Approach in a Volatile World

Posted at 14:48 by James Howell

The outlook for the developed economies has deteriorated with the IMF downgrading their growth forecast for this year and 2012. To highlight some of the issues I have extracted the following key themes from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook that was released during September.

The IMF’s growth forecast for developed economies in 2011 was cut by 0.6 percentage points to 1.6%, while the 2012 forecast was reduced by 0.7 percentage points to 1.9%. The forecast for emerging markets was reduced by only 0.2 percentage points for 2011 to 6.4%, and by 0.3 percentage points for 2012 to 6.1% (see charts attached). Interestingly, the GDP growth forecast for almost every major part of the world was lowered for both 2011 and 2012. Japan was the only exception; GDP growth for 2011 was raised by 0.2 percentage points to -0.5%.

IMF Growth Forecasts

IMF Growth Forecast

A barrage of shocks hit the international economy this year:

Japan was struck by the devastating Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami

Unrest swelled in some oil-producing countries.

The handover from public to private demand in the US economy stalled.

Euro area encountered major financial turbulence.

Global markets suffered a major sell-off of risky assets, and there are growing signs of spill-overs to the real economy.

The risks are clearly to the downside and, according to the IMF, two warrant particular attention from policymakers. Either one of these eventualities would have severe repercussions for global growth.

The first is that the crisis in the euro area runs beyond the control of policymakers, notwithstanding the strong policy response agreed at the 21 July 2011, EU summit. Policymakers must swiftly ratify the commitments made at the July summit, and in the meantime, the European Central Bank (ECB) must continue to intervene strongly to maintain orderly conditions in sovereign debt markets. Leaders must stand by their commitments to do whatever it takes to preserve trust in national policies and the euro. Furthermore, given declining inflation pressure and heightened financial and sovereign tensions, the ECB should lower its policy rate if downside risks to growth and inflation persist.

The second is that activity in the United States, already softening, might suffer further blows – for example, from a political impasse over fiscal consolidation, a weak housing market, rapid increases in household saving rates, or deteriorating financial conditions. Deep political divisions leave the course of US policy highly uncertain.

Risks in emerging and developing economies seem less severe. Signs of overheating still warrant close attention, particularly from the monetary and prudential authorities. Risks related to commodity prices and social and political unrest in some parts of the world continue to loom large.

Against this backdrop we remain cautiously positioned across our funds, with underweight equity positions. In addition as a tactical call we have picked up exposure to funds, such as the Allan Gray Stable Fund, which offers some hedging characteristics. We are watching developments in global markets vigilantly and if there are any changes in the macro economic outlook we will change the asset allocation of the funds accordingly. But for now we are positioned for a world of continued uncertainty, volatility and sub-par growth in the developed world.

“And in today already walks tomorrow.”

~Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Ursula Maritz
Chief Investment Officer

17 Aug

How do we Manage Risk in Uncertain Times?

Posted at 15:31 by James Howell

Events in August have been unprecedented, with US debt being downgraded by Standard and Poor’s for the first time ever from AAA to a AA+, with a negative outlook. In response to the extreme market volatility that followed and a contraction in the growth outlook, the Fed announced that it would extend near zero interest rates for the next 2 years. This is the first time ever that the Fed has made a clear forecast on where interest rates will be in future.

These events resulted in extreme market moves with the S&P down 11.5% since July while the JSE is down 7.2%. Investors fled into US Treasuries pushing US yields down to 2.26% – achieving the effects of a QE3 without Fed intervention.  While gold and the Swiss Franc, which are seen as safe haven assets, skyrocketed, with gold going above $1780.

FTSE/JSE Africa All Share vs S&P500 Composite Index

Source: I-Net

The downgrade was not a complete surprise as the S&P provided warning ahead of the US debt ceiling fiasco. Moody’s and Fitch, however, have kept their AAA rating but with a negative outlook. The downgrade has resulted in fears that other countries such as France could lose their AAA status, further exacerbating concerns in the already fragile Eurozone.

Have the fundamentals changed that significantly or are the markets over-reacting again?

The US recovery is proving to be more sluggish than initially expected particularly in the labour market. This is not a surprise and is in line with our view that the US recovery would be difficult and sub-par relative to its’ long term average growth of 2.5%.  Given present valuations, the markets are pricing in a full blown recession and a collapse in earnings. In our opinion this is an extreme view and there is nothing in the data pointing to a global recession. In addition, US balance sheets are very strong and recent corporate earnings have exceeded expectations.  Whilst it is plausible that growth could weaken due to – consumer deleveraging, attacks on real income through higher inflation, limited room to stimulate through monetary or fiscal policy – there are many other equally plausible scenarios where growth stabilises or even accelerates – as company balance sheets are healthy, investment is firming, export markets in emerging countries are firm and QE3 will be put in place if need be.

These corrections, has made cheap assets such as equities even cheaper and expensive assets such as bonds and cash even more expensive.  For example the S&P price to book ratio is now below 2X versus 3X at the end of 2007. Valuations on the JSE are also attractive with price to book at 2.05X and a 1 year forward PE of less than 10.

How do we manage risk at times of uncertainty and high volatility?

1. The very nature of our funds, being invested cross a variety of asset classes, provide clear risk diversification   benefits as the funds won’t reflect the full impact of the market correction as seen in the 2008 correction and as well as now (see graph) as other assets perform differently to equities . For example, bonds have rallied now and the offshore component has benefitted from a weaker Rand.

Southern Charter Funds Performance Report

Southern Charter Funds of Funds Perform in Difficult Markets. Source: I-Net

2. As uncertainty has grown we have been active in our tactical asset allocation having steadily reduced our equity position to underweight relative to benchmarks, prior to the correction. We added this to cash to deploy as global risks reduce.

3. In addition, at times of uncertainty, we tend to select managers who are more defensive, given their value bias in stock selection.

4. Given our valuation bias in making tactical asset allocation calls there is a margin of safely in the price that we pay for the assets. Historically this has made our funds more defensive than the average fund in the same unit trust category. This is highlighted in three graphs, below, showing our risk return profile since inception.  Furthermore in an analysis done by Old Mutual Consulting Actuaries on our funds they concluded that “the portfolios have delivered better than average downside protection since inception”.

I hope that this commentary provides you with some comfort through these uncertain times. And to end with a quote from Warren Buffet made in 2008 at the height of the crisis:

“Today people who hold cash equivalents feel comfortable. They shouldn’t. They have opted for a terrible long term asset, one that pays virtually nothing and is certain to depreciate in value “.

Ursula Maritz
Chief Investment Officer
Southern Charter

« Return to the Blog Home Page